Thursday, March 04, 2010

Making use of knowledge

Why the issue of intellectual property rights needs some attention

A recent survey by a European law firm, Taylor Wessing, revealed that India along with other BRIC economies ranked in the bottom half of the list in protecting and enforcing Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). While India is ranked at a poor 19th; Brazil, Russia and China ranked 20th, 21st and 22nd respectively. Though, there are varied lists by different firms, but one thing is common to all and that is developed countries like the UK, US and Germany rank in the first positions and BRIC economies continue to remain in the bottom of the chart.

Well, the issue of IPR is not as easy as can be gauged. To put it in simpler fashion, IPR is a way of protecting someone’s ideas or innovations. In the 21st century, when knowledge is considered to be the driving force of evolution, intellectuals have all the rights to protect their ideas and innovations. Though to many, it seemed that protecting rights means encouraging monopoly indirectly, widespread practices of copyrights, trademarks and patents in successful capitalist economies reflect that IPR does not necessarily act against competition. The issue of IPR is very important especially for drugs and technology innovations. A drug manufacturer invests about $1.4 billion to launch a new drug in the market. Thus, it is very important for him to protect his innovations. Similarly, technology is getting obsolete in a shorter span of time than it did ever before while substantial investments is needed to discover new technology. Thus protecting innovations for even mere commercial reasons is all the more important to entrepreneurs or investors today than ever before. Moreover, data reveals that 93 per cent - 94 per cent of the cases, patents fail which means that hardly 6 per cent - 7 per cent of the patents successfully work out. In addition, while the issue of IPR remains important to promote ideas, complications are looming large, arising out of changes in trends and business environments, especially in the era of globalisation. Outsourcing is a global trend. Even big multinationals are outsourcing R&D from Third World countries for economic benefits. None of the BMW, GM or Ford, manufactures every part for their cars they sell. They just put their logos in the cars made of outsourced parts, manufactured in different parts of the world. It is just their brands that sell. Thus, international firms need potential partners in these developing countries who can be trusted.

To conclude, developing countries like India have a lot more to do to nurture, promote and protect knowledge and innovations. And for this national universities should have been able to play crucial role which they have so far not been able to do successfully. It is important to realise that ideas are generated in university classrooms and libraries, but they are needed in headquarters of big multinationals. As long as, there is a gap between the two, ideas cannot be converted into actions. Fortunately, thirteen or fourteen Indian universities have included IPR in their curriculums but it is a long way to go, unless UGC drafts and incorporates proper IPR policy framework and universities to create technology transfer offices. As India aspires to be the knowledge hub, it is all the more important for her to take up the issue seriously. Hope that our policymakers and bureaucrats will understand the grievances and act swiftly unlike in most other cases! A hope can fail, but shouldn't be let down.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2009


An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Read these article :-



Outlook Magazine money editor quits
Don't trust the Indian Media!

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

The old man and his sea

The millions who celebrated the anniversary of Iranian Revolution believe that West view is indelibly coloured.

It is interesting how the Western media utilises ‘Zeros’ (or the lack of it) to make people understand what it wants them to understand. So, the opposition gathering of a few thousands is called “several thousands” and 3-4 million-strong support for the regime is called merely “hundreds of thousands”. But there is a problem. The proliferation of new media has led to the proliferation of news that have been broadcasted mass of people stretching to kilometres to all sides from Azadi Square where the nucleus of the rally and celebration was. Since last year’s election, western analysts and media have been predicting doomsday for the regime spawning all sorts of theories that were based less on facts and more on fancies. Ali Jawad, a Tehran based political expert says, “In its coverage of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the language of the West is indelibly coloured with imperial hubris and Euro-centric prejudice. This is not new.” As masses poured in to all the major cities of the country, the media had no option but to air the picture. However, it was interesting to note how those videos and pictures were quickly sent into archive within few hours when videos of last year's anti-Ahmadinejad protests are still shown. The language too is interesting to note. For example, CNN’s Ivan Watson made a point of mentioning that free food and drinks were handed out to those celebrating the 31st anniversary of the revolution.Watson is completely unaware of the fact that all the gatherings in any Islamic country have mandatory refreshments for people. Naturally, the lack of imagination is glaring.

The Guardian insisted that the gathering comprised seminary students, women and elderly people. This assumption that in order to support Ahmadinejad one must be from a poor, rural or illiterate background highlights a larger bias that works. West’s Iran “experts”, most of them who have never visited Iran, or have years ago, have their own perceptions driven by their imagination. But facts remain different. This has been made obvious by a current survey done in Iran by The Programme on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA), a wing of the Centre on Policy Attitudes (COPA) and the Centre for International and Security Studies at Maryland (CISSM). The study showcased some disturbing results for the western analysts. On the question of whether Ahmadinejad won the June 12 election, in all polls, a majority said they planned to or did vote for Ahmadinejad. These numbers ranged from 57 per cent before the elections to 66 per cent post elections. None of the polls found indications of support for regime change. For the question on whether they consider Ahmadinejad to be the legitimate President, about 76 to 83 per cent of people agreed that the results were fair.Talking to TSI, Steven Kull, the head of the institute and the chief analyst said, “The findings do not support the belief that a majority rejected Ahmadinejad. Our analysis is that it would not be prudent to base US policy on the assumption that the Iranian public is in a pre-revolutionary state of mind.”

As with all nations, there are several challenges that confront the Islamic Republic; from issues of employment and social mobility to the scope of the public space. However, it will be far from truth to say that people want regime change. The presence of Internet savvy Mousavi supporters might give a different picture; however, the support on street for the regime is there for everybody to see.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2009


An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Read these article :-



Outlook Magazine money editor quits
Don't trust the Indian Media!

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Thank heavens for the power trip!

According to a report by Indiabulls, “the company sells power on merchant basis through short-term PPAs; such agreements command high realisations of around Rs.5–8 per unit.”On a standalone basis (the steel business), while net sales grew by Rs.76.46 billion (a growth of 41.7%), net profits grew by a relatively modest 21.7% yoy to Rs.15.36 billion. This is still far better than what most steel players have faced. Vikrant Gujaral comments on the situation, “We were among the early risers to the deteriorating conditions. However, since JSPL’s product range includes both long and flat products we were well placed to optimize our product mix in consort with changing market realities...” Also, the company relies a lot on the domestic market, where demand has continued to grow irrespective of recession (exports were only 13% of turnover); so they did not need to cut production. The report by Indiabulls further credits the good numbers to the 35.8% yoy increase in the average sales realisation of saleable steel.

Moreover, while a lot of steel companies were looking at horizontal integration as their strategic priority, JSPL has been looking at things differently. Gujaral puts it across thus, “No company in our space can hope to survive without robust backward integration. JSPL has always believed in this and assiduously built dedicated sources for key raw materials (ore, power and coal) in keeping with the integrated steel producer model...” The company has indeed believed in consistent investment, while maintaining a significantly low debt-equity ratio of around 0.8. However, with respect to Q1, 2009-10, the company saw a standalone fall in Net Profit after tax on standalone basis by 25% to Rs.3 billion due to low steel prices. Again, power business is helping them ride the cycle, as consolidated PAT rose by 123% to Rs. 9.88 billion. As steel prices begin their up cycle, the situation should further improve. According to Gujaral, “There are encouraging signs of demand picking up. Prices have increased by about 8-10 per cent in the domestic market and 7 to 8 per cent globally.” However, he admits that the recovery is still some distance away.

For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2009


An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Read these article :-


Tuesday, February 16, 2010

CAN ‘OLD WATER’ BE ‘MINE’ AGAIN?

SAIL’S TOWNSHIP at PURANAPANI IS now A GHOST TOWN, BUT A NEW P-P-P PROVIDES NECESSARY HOPE OF REVIVAL BY Sutanu Guru

This small story must start start with a big thanks to Virbdhadra Singh, Union Minister of Cabinet for Steel. While planning this special issue on Nehru’s modern temples, we came up with a late idea of going to Rourkela, where the Nehru vision was fused with German engineering to create Rourkela Steel Plant, a key member of the Steel Authority of India (SAIL) family. A request sent to the minister’s office was processed as fast as you take to download a song from iTunes. And I had the opportunity of going to some places which most analysts and pundits talking and writing about SAIL and Rourkela Steel Plant usually tend to forget or ignore.

For me personally, it was the nth visit to the steel city, having gone there often during my school and college days in the 1970s and 80s when the word ‘Public Sector’ was something small town middle class Indians desperately wanted to be part of. Going down a mine shaft is a heady as well as scary experience; and you cannot avoid mines when you talk about steel. But more intriguing for me was a visit to a small place called Purunapani; a town, a hamlet, a desolate outpost of industrialization or harbinger of how public sector India is now rediscovering itself through strategic alliances with private sector companies and entrepreneurs.

“This mine was more than 60 metres deep. And limestone used to be sent from here to our plant and other places night and days”, says Jogeswar Badaik, Mines Manager, who is in charge of this outpost. Badaik is quintessentially middle class Indian; he has worked his way through to an office where he can press a buzzer that has a man come scurrying across to fetch tea and refreshments. He is worried about his child who is down with a flu; but he tells me confidently that the SAIL hospital in Rourkela can handle any problem. I am more interested in what were once upon a time mines that fed the industrial juggernaut in Rourkela.
For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2009


An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Read these article :-


Monday, February 15, 2010

The Price of the last drop...

Water is synonymous to life but is also a cause of losing many lives

The water resources are plunging in Middle-East and North Africa, which hold 5 per cent of world population, but only 0.9 per cent of the world’s potable water resources. The countries hit by water scarcity are constantly on the rise – from only three in 1955 (which included Bahrain, Jordan, and Kuwait) reaching to 11 in 1990 (with the addition of Algeria, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Tunisia, and Somalia), with another seven are likely to join the group by 2025.

The potable water of Middle-East originates from three major river basins - Euphrates Tigris, Nile and Jordan. Water, without a slightest doubt, is a catalyst of conflict as more and more water scarce countries jostle for their increasing share. The 1967 war between Syria and Israel is being an example. Water conflict is also a basis of many diplomatic efforts and bilateral treaties, like the US brokered Johnson Negotiation in 1953-55 or agreement of Full Utilisation of Nile water in 1959 and Israeli-Jordan treaty in 1994. The twin factors of rapidly rising population and falling water levels are creating ripple in the interstate relations and even evolving into conflicts. There is a fall-out between Israel, Palestine and Jordan over Jordan River basin, between Turkey and Syria over Tigris and Euphrates; and between Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia over Nile.

In South Asia, however, with the exploding population and increasing environmental degradation, water resource will always be a bone of contention among the countries. In spite of various political and economic divergences, the South Asian countries have shown remarkable maturity in dealing with water distribution. Indus Water Treaty was signed in 1960, between India and Pakistan, where three eastern rivers namely Ravi, Sutlej, and Beas belong to India, while the western rivers viz. Indus, Jhelum and Chenab belongs to Pakistan. In spite of odd differences (like India is building two dams on Jhelum and nine on Chenab), the two countries have upheld IWT even at the lowest ebb of their relationship. Likewise, Ganges Water-Sharing Treaty, between India and Bangladesh in 1996, was a path breaking effort to solve the long-standing disagreement, where as Mahakali Treaty in the same year was an attempt to resolve water sharing crisis between India and Nepal.

For Complete IIPM Article, Click on IIPM Article

Source :
IIPM Editorial, 2009


An IIPM and Professor Arindam Chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist) Initiative

Read these article :-