Showing posts with label FDI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FDI. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

MEXICO’S ECONOMIC REBOUND

So far, so good. The Mexican Policy Makers now need to get back to The Drawing Board if they want to Convert The Recent Rebound in Economic Activity into a long-term Sustainable Recovery. 

Further, much of the boost to the economic numbers comes from the Mexican government, which stepped up its assistance to the economy during 2010. Government consumption expenditures increased by 5.7% during Q2 2010 compared to a meager increase of 0.6% during Q2 2009. No doubt, the rebound has some teeth if Mexico’s export sector (exports of goods and services grew by 28.8% y-o-y during H1 2010) is examined, but this positive performance too is negated by a 25.9% increase in the imports during the same period.

So, is there a way out for this crime-prone nation that also has a history of bad economic decision making (Economic Deterioration in the 1970s, 1982 Debt Crisis, 1995 Tequila Crisis, to name a few)? While Banco de México didn’t respond to the queries sent by B&E (till the time this magazine went to print), Eugenio J. Aleman, the US based Senior Economist at Wells Fargo Securities tells B&E, “The Mexican economy requires serious reforms that must include constitutional changes to allow FDI in the all-important petroleum sector. However, we believe there is no political will to do this today. Maybe a change in the political landscape in the coming years will create the opportunity to move in this direction.”

No doubt, the government’s responses to the recent global financial crisis have helped the country weather the 2009 recession, but then Mexico’s key challenge now will be to reform its tax system to replace the declining share of oil revenues (which constitutes about 40% of total revenues) with tax revenues as the oil production in the country has fallen from over 2 million barrels per day in 2005 to below 1 million barrels per day. With Mexico’s tax revenues representing only 10% of GDP (Mexico has one of the lowest tax collection rates in Latin America), policymakers will now find it hard to meet the economy’s growing needs.

Further, Mexico’s over dependence on US, which makes it vulnerable to the economic threats, also needs to be done away with. Although Mexican policymakers have done their bit over the last 20 years through trade liberalisation, privatisation efforts, and a floating exchange rate regime, these policies have not been enough to protect Mexico from fluctuations in the US. What’s more? Mexico shipped about 80% of its total exports (about 26% of its GDP in 2009) to US last year. Thus, a change in US demand can have a severe impact on Mexico’s economic health.

No doubt, the Mexican economy is rebounding, but there is nothing much for policy makers to actually celebrate. And if they really want to do so, they definitely need to get back to the drawing board to craft structurally logical polices that ensure a steep rise in the gross fixed investments and tax revenues apart from some serious reforms which includes allowing FDI in all-important petroleum sector. Else, the war on drugs may soon become their secondary focus!


Tuesday, July 10, 2012

“Kiranas only cater to food retail”

B&E: With the Indian retail space developing rapidly, what are some of the changes you expect to see going forward?
AB:
In the coming years, staff in retail will be better trained, customer service will improve, retail formats will become larger and there will be more choices of retailers in several underserviced categories such as home improvement and value fashion.

B&E: Foreign direct investment in the fast-growing retail sector is being viewed from a positive as well as negative perspective with respect to job creation. What are your views on the same?
AB:
If FDI in multibrand retail is restricted to only cities with a one million plus population, around 4.6 million new jobs will be created. If this is extended across India, around 11 million jobs will be created. Inflation will also come down because of better efficiencies, lesser wastage and higher competition just like telecom.

B&E: Why should India open up the sector to FDI? Why not set up retail infrastructure from the country’s own resources?
AB:
Indian retailers don’t have the resources. Telecom developed much faster after FDI was allowed and this helped bring down telephone call charges by 99% in 16 years based on purchasing power of the rupee. The same scenario was repeated in the automobiles sector. For decades, we were forced to buy horrible cars like the Ambassador and the Premier Padmini. With FDI being allowed, the Indian consumer today has a choice of more than 80 types of cars from 17 brands, and also at a wide range of price points.

B&E: There is a fear that India would be swamped by multinationals that would kill local entrepreneurs, especially the small shops. Do you believe that FDI can affect kirana stores across India in this manner?
AB:
Kiranas only cater to food retail, which is just 30.3% of the total retail market in urban India. Modern retail can capture a maximum of 7.5% of the total food retail market in urban India, based on several factors. Thus, modern retail can displace a maximum of 20,000-odd kirana stores. On the other hand, modern food retail will help create new local entrepreneurs for providing various services to modern retailers – such as logistics, warehousing, delivery, security, housekeeping, parking management, staff uniform supply and laundry, POS materials, et al.