Monday, October 08, 2012

Creative capitalism in fact holds all the answers?

Muhammad Yunus, Nobel laureate, explains why creative capitalism in fact holds all the answers to improve human life, as told to B&E’s Neha Sarin

B&E : So are you trying to say that there is really no difference between Creative Capitalism and Corporate Social Responsibility?
MY:
What actually is Corporate Social Responsibility?! It is something which started with the idea to help other people; but today, CSR has only become money to gain better public relations. You sponsor a cricket team, a rock concert, that’s CSR. The money goes to the R department and does not go to help poor people. CSR budget is now public relations money.

B&E What kind of government support did you get for your concept of Micro-credit and Grameen Bank? What are the kinds of hurdles you faced to achieve what you had dreamt of?
MY:
There were so many hurdles. This was something new. So I knew it was very critical. The kind of words they used irritated me for a while. You had to give money to the poor women. You had to deal with them. You had to address unknown women. These were the hurdles we faced. Then there were legal hurdles too. Initially we did not have any law, which explained how you could lend money without any security. We did not have any banking structure like the government banking system had. When you took some money from the government, it puts some money in the bank @ p.a. interest of 5-6%. As a token of support the government deposits the money. But in our case, we did not even take money from the government. We took it from the borrowers. We take money from them and then lend them to the poor people. That’s how we have always worked, and worked well….

B&E: Aneel Karnani (a Strategic Management professor at Michigan University) criticises the whole idea and system of Micro-credit. He said that giving money to the ladies-folk creates all the problem due to the low level of education and women freedom in these societies. Do critics like him make your job more difficult?
MY:
People come with different perceptions. If lending money to poor women make them laugh-at and criticised, let the people laugh. I don’t know what this gentleman sees wrong with it. But he may have some points. I don’t want to argue with that. But it does not convince me that he can lend money to the rich. See, in this world if you want to do something, people will criticise and say something.

B&E: Isn’t it risky that money is lent to poor people?
MY:
That is not true at all. In Grameen Bank alone, we have a high rate of return of about 97-99%. Whether we work in India or Bangladesh or Somalia or Costa Rica, it does not matter. High rate of return has impressed people about micro-credit systems.

B&E: For how many people did you actually stand as a guarantor? And what was the amount you lent in total?
MY:
There were almost 20,000 borrowers to begin with in the first place. And the total amount that was borrowed amounted to a massive 20 million taka (an average of 1,000 taka per head)!

B&E: With such a huge risk potential, didn’t your strategy backfire or at least weren’t you hesitant to some extent considering the possible negative outcomes?
MY:
See, we trust people. It is a continuous system. We do well with them. So they come to us again. Then they stay back with us. We remind them. It is not a one shot thing. So there is no such room of doubt.

B&E: Which was the bank that actually helped you in the end?
MY:
The bank is called Janata Bank. It is a government-owned bank and sits in the campus of the University where I teach.

B&E: So what kind of response are you receiving from the market today ?
MY:
Yes, we don’t give advertisements in any form of media or newspaper. Yes if you talk about word of mouth we do. We write and people read about it everywhere. Through this, the whole world came to know. Thus the word spreads and naturally so. And about the response, the results are there to prove that it has all been really well accepted. Our model of CSR has done wonders; and that is what real socially responsible capitalistic business should learn to do. No business grows forever without the growth of the entire society and it’s time the global capitalists learn the truth…


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Saturday, October 06, 2012

How 2G is India’s First Pro-Poor Scam

The chatterati and the pundits seem to be behaving as if the 2G scam marks the end of the Indian civilization. There is passionate agonizing over how the carpetbaggers of crony capitalism have looted more than Rs 1.7 lakh crore (almost $40 billion) of potential revenue due to the Indian exchequer. There are inevitable and familiar laments about how the money could have been used to build more schools, health care centres et al for poor Indians (the real scam being that enough schools and health care centers for the poor have not been built even 63 years after independence; 54 years of Nehruvian socialism; 39 years of Garibi Hatao and 20 years of economic reforms).

Forgive me for being cynical; but I think the poor of India would actually cheer and welcome 2G style scams because they have actually given something worthwhile to the poor. Look at it this way: till former Minister A. Raja started doling out telecom licenses like prasad in a crowded temple, a handful of telecom operators were making a killing and the really poor could not still afford the tariffs charged by them. Post the monumental 2G scam, telecom tariffs actually dropped to a paisa a second and even lower. More importantly, intense competition forced telecom operators – both old and new – to look beyond saturated urban markets. The fact is: most of the 300 odd million new subscribers since 2008 live in small towns and rural India. For them, the power of mobile connectivity at often Rs.100 a month is literally a dream come true. Also, do not forget how smart entrepreneurs have grabbed this exploding market by importing Chinese handsets. Most of these models are in sync with this new market: they offer long battery (upto 72 hours, even 72 days!) life to people for whom long and unending power cuts are an unending reality.

Ask these poor Indians about the moral, intellectual and existential issues raised by the 2G scam and they will laugh at you. And justifiably. For more than 60 years, they have helplessly witnessed false promise after promise and scam after scam without any material difference to their wretched lives. Now, scam or not, they have got something concrete and worthwhile. As far as they are concerned, the pundits can go on debating to kingdom come.

And don’t underestimate the poor or their ability to figure out what is good for them. The perpetually scam tainted MRNEGA is another example of a pro-poor scam. Everybody knows corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and contractors are still brazenly using NREGA funds to line their pockets. And yet the poor in rural India consider the scheme to be a divine blessing. Their logic? Earlier, they used to get nothing; now they at least get something. Raving and ranting and railing against NREGA corruption is not going to change that.

The fact is: Indira Gandhi was dead right when she categorized corruption as a global phenomenon. You must be living in cuckoo land if you think there is no corruption in countries like Japan, USA, UK et al. The best a society can do is miniminize corruption; it can never be eliminated.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Friday, October 05, 2012

US MID-TERM ELECTIONS: LOSS OF DEMOCRATS

The Tea-Party Tidal Wave has Managed to undo the Gains of Democrats; The Shellacking Serves as a Massive Rebuke to President Barack Obama. As Republicans gain Majority Control of the house, Obama needs to Strategically Re-Align his Policies, Priorities and recast his Presidency keeping the 2012 Re-Election in mind 

William A. Galtson, Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, Brookings, says to B&E, “Voters are understandably frightened, rancid, and profoundly disheartened about the financial prospects.” Galston further explains, “The well-documented successes of the fiscal normalisation and stimulus initiatory are concealed to a populace responding to the here and now, not to the counter-factual of how much worse it might have been.” But, in all certainty, it is the future of this political gridlock, as both the Democrats and the Republicans have the power to gridlock the legislative process, which will script the future of America, the American people and most importantly that of President Obama. It will indeed be difficult for Obama to reach out to his fellow Republicans who are intent on repealing ObamaCare, his signature health care legislation; as a matter of fact, many Republicans are hell bent on opposing just about everything Obama stands for. Other than ObamaCare, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the policy on use of bio-fuels for transportation are a few such policies which the Republicans would want to repeal. With less bargaining power, it is but natural that Obama will have a tough time brokering peace between Israel and Palestine and the sailing is certainly not going to be smooth in the case of Afghanistan and Iraq. November 18, 2010, when the sessions begin, and the sessions thereafter will be equally interesting; it will not be the usual cordial and supportive Democrat Congress for Obama but the antagonistic Republicans, the sessions will not be chaired by the like minded Nancy Pelosi but by the perma-tanned John Boehner (most probably).

Given the flimsy majority that the Democrats continue to enjoy in the upper house (the Senate), the President would like to push through some of his platform policies, the only hurdle being Republicans who can play havoc if they insist on using filibuster (a delaying tactic that requires 60 votes to overcome). In such a case, one can expect President Obama to take a leaf out of President Harry Truman’s presidency era and follow suite – what he can probably do is double down on his strategy (which critics claim Americans have roundly rejected), change course – move to the Left and appease his critics and challenge the ‘do-nothing’ Republicans. It might be tough to replicate the Truman strategy of 1946, but given the circumstance when the Republicans have surpassed their ‘Republican Revolution’ of 1994, challenging the opponents and the inherent gridlock will make for a big comeback.

The worst fear is that Obama would become a lame duck president for the remaining two years of his presidency. And that fear is rounded off by the fact that while it took the better part of two years to campaign for his presidency, this time around, with just two years left in his Presidency and a choice between the Devil (reviving the economy) and the deep sea (trying for a second term), one believes Obama has already met his endgame. For all practical purposes, Obama is lost to America; and America, to Obama!


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Monday, September 10, 2012

UNIVERSITIES: WEIRD RESEARCHES

A number of worthless and frivolous researches are giving the World of science and reason a boorish tinge; we say ban them!

The inane tale continues. The National Institute of Health in the US conducted a study, and spent $500,000 of stimulus money to reveal why men prefer to have sex without condoms! While the objective of the research might still be logical considering the focus on promoting safe sex, the moneys spent to find out the obvious (or is it?) is what is surprising. The University of Florida (ranked 193) spent $325,394 given as stimulus fund, to find how environment affects sex related decisions of women. Thanks to them, apparently we have renewed emancipation of women in our midst.

If it were just about the comic relief, we could have actually chosen not to highlight their achievements. But this is really about how the world’s best universities waste resources and misuse their state-of-art resources in researches that bring in no substantial development to mankind or the planet. There seems to be no clear-cut logic in undertaking research to find out which side a flock of pigeons would turn when faced with a wind draft, or whether good looking people make more money than ugly ones (yes, they do, as revealed by a research by the University of California in 2007).

But then, is it any wonder that such researches do in fact benefit private enterprises? For example, the ugly versus beautiful research could well be a great boost to the cosmetics industry even if a fraction of the population chooses to believe it. The same is apparent in the study conducted in the US last year, which showed that women with bigger breasts were found to be smarter. Lobbies appear to be at work even when contradictory researches keep coming to the fore, like ones that debate on the merits and demerits of tea vs coffee and vice versa.

Sometimes, researches that are meant for serious and genuine issues come up with non-serious and bizarre conclusions. In a scenario where countries, universities and research institution are finding it tough to fund their researches for human development projects and development of drugs that could save lives and uplift lifestyles, it’s criminal that a few universities don’t mind blowing away invaluable capital to take out notably worthless researches. Evidently, one can’t say enough when one implores that such researches should be banned.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Saturday, September 08, 2012

Ready for a divine holiday?

In the hills of Tirupati, nature and man have collaborated to proffer the traveller more than just a holy communion

It was still dark outside. Lord Balaji was being awakened. Slokas were being recited. Tightly packed among the throngs of people offering their orisons, I tried to get a peak of the devotees who were rolling on the ground around the temple, slowly chanting the Lord’s name. Some minutes later we all shuffled in a single file along a long path. In no time I was face to face with the imposing and awe-inspiring idol of Lord Balaji. Five moments later, before I could entirely take in the magnificence before me, I was asked to move along. Roughly 60,000 people come for a darshan of Lord Venkateswara/ Lord Balaji every day to this ancient temple at Tirumala. I’d travelled in a car for some 150 kms from Chennai to reach; pilgrims often abandon their vehicles and climb roughly 4000 steps for a darshan, for their prayers to be fulfilled by Lord Balaji. I had witnessed the Suprabhatam (awakening the Lord) that morning; similar sevas are conducted through the day, where the Lord is given a bath, the Lord is given breakfast, to finally when around 10pm the Lord is put to bed.

3200ft above sea level, the Tirumala Hill comprises seven hills. On the seventh hill is the sacred temple of Sri Venkateswara. Legend has it that Thondaiman, the ruler of Thondaimandalam (present-day Kanchipuram), built the temple after Lord Vishnu appeared in his dreams. Its current grandeur and richness is primarily thanks to the competition among rulers of South Indian dynasties, be it the Pallavas of Kanchipuram (9th century AD), the Cholas of Thanjavur (10 AD), the Pandyas of Madurai, or the kings and chieftains of Vijayanagar (14th-15th century AD), who all attempted to out-do each other in their offerings to the Lord. This tradition especially gained strength during the reign of the Vijayanagar dynasty, and to this day there are people who offer bags filled with jewels to the Lord.

Another offering especially associated with this temple is that of hair. Both men and women completely shave their head as a gesture of sacrifice in return for fulfilment of their prayers or as penance. The temple earns in millions annually through the sale of tonnes of devotees’ locks! Thus through receiving the offerings of hair and people’s wealth, the temple has built a reputation of being the richest temple in the world.


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.
For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face